AVGO
vs
MRVL
Broadcom Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc., measured on the same ten characteristics.
These are in different sub-sectors — Semiconductors and AI Semiconductors — so valuation and margin norms differ between them and the rows below are not strictly like-for-like. They differ on 9 of 9 measured dimensions; anything within 2% is shown as level rather than split. Nothing here totals to a winner — which differences matter is your call, not ours.
| Measure | AVGO |
MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Quant Scoreour composite quality read | 59 | 69HIGHER |
| Revenue growth (YoY)faster top-line growth | +47.9%HIGHER | +36.5% |
| Net marginmore of each sale kept | +38.8%HIGHER | +27.9% |
| Gross marginpricing power | +76.3%HIGHER | +52.2% |
| P/Ea richer multiple, not automatically worse | 61.4× | 72.0×HIGHER |
| 1-month moverecent price direction | -4.9% | +18.2%HIGHER |
| 3-month movemedium-term price direction | -12.4% | +9.1%HIGHER |
| Betamoves more than the market | 1.47 | — |
| Analyst upsidethird-party consensus, not our view | +42.6%HIGHER | +29.1% |
| Market capcompany size | $1.75THIGHER | $194.7B |
How the Quant Score works
It blends fundamentals, valuation, momentum, analyst signal and macro regime into one 0-100 number. It is a quality descriptor, not a buy or sell signal. Read the methodology →
Real research, free during beta
Every stock we track, scored daily. Quant Score, conflict detection, Reverse DCF, peer comparison. We do the homework.
Open the live dashboard →Questions or feedback? Email support@tickermover.com
TickerMover is a research tool, not financial advice, and not FCA-authorised. Figures are computed from live universe data and refresh every 5 minutes during market hours. Analyst upside is third-party consensus, not our forecast. Capital at risk.